This site is not affiliated with Dr. Barry Brock, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, or any court. It is an independent information resource. Nothing here is legal or medical advice.
Quick exit ✕

How the system actually works

How to report a doctor in California

Reporting a physician to the Medical Board of California is free, it takes about twenty minutes, and it does not commit you to a lawsuit or to anything else. Here is exactly what the process is, what the Board can and cannot do, and what happens after you press submit.

Reporting and suing are two different things

People often assume that telling the Medical Board what happened is the first step toward a lawsuit, or that it rules one out. Neither is true. A Board complaint is a licensing matter. A civil claim is a court matter. They run on separate tracks, with separate deadlines and separate people handling them. You can do one, both, or neither, and doing one does not oblige you to do the other.

What the Medical Board can and cannot do

The Medical Board of California licenses and disciplines physicians. It is not a court and it is not on anyone’s side. Understanding the boundary saves a lot of disappointment later.

The Board can The Board cannot
Investigate a licensed physician’s conduct Award you money or damages
Place a licence on probation, restrict it, or revoke it Order a refund of what you paid
Require monitoring, education or a practice chaperone Bring criminal charges
Publish disciplinary action on the physician’s public licence record Represent you or give you legal advice
Refer a case to the Attorney General for formal charges File a civil lawsuit on your behalf

If what you want is compensation, or an account of what an institution knew, the Board is the wrong tool. That is what a civil claim is for. If what you want is for a licence to be looked at, the Board is the only body that can do it.

The three ways to file

All three go to the same place. Pick whichever you will actually finish.

Online

The Board takes complaints through its BreEZe online system, reachable from the “File a Complaint” section of mbc.ca.gov. This is the fastest route and it gives you a confirmation you can keep.

By mail

Medical Board of California, ATTN: Central Complaint Unit, 2005 Evergreen Street, Suite 1200, Sacramento, CA 95815-5401. Fax is (916) 263-2435. Mail is slower, but some people prefer putting it in their own words on paper, and there is nothing wrong with that.

By phone

The Consumer Information Unit answers on (800) 633-2322. They will not take the complaint over the phone in most cases, but they will walk you through the form and tell you whether your situation is something the Board handles at all. If you are not sure you want to file, this is a low-cost way to find out what filing would involve.

What to have ready before you start

  • The physician’s name, and the practice or hospital where you were seen, as best you remember it.
  • Approximate dates. “Sometime in the spring of 2011” is a usable answer. You are not expected to have exact dates from years ago.
  • What happened, in your own words. Plain description works better than legal language. Investigators are reading for specifics — what was said, what was done, whether anyone else was in the room.
  • Medical records, if you have them. You do not need them to file. If you want them, our page on requesting your records explains how, and getting them commits you to nothing.
  • A records authorisation. The Board will usually ask you to sign a form letting it obtain your chart from the provider. You can decline, though it limits what investigators can verify.

Can you file anonymously?

You can submit without identifying yourself. The Board will still log it. But an anonymous complaint is a weaker complaint in practice, because investigators cannot come back to you for the date, the record, or the detail that turns an allegation into a provable one.

If you do give your name, understand the trade-off honestly: the Board’s own description of its process says it may provide the licensee with a summary of the substance of the complaint material. Your identity is not published, and it is not handed to the public — but it is not sealed from the doctor either. That is a real consideration and it is reasonable to weigh it before filing. Our page on privacy and anonymity covers the equivalent question on the civil side, where the protections are different and generally stronger.

What happens after you file

The Board describes its own investigation process as “lengthy and thorough,” which in practice means months, sometimes longer. Here is the sequence.

Stage What happens
Central Complaint Unit Reviews whether the complaint is within the Board’s jurisdiction; may request records and a written response from the physician.
Medical consultant review A physician consultant assesses whether the facts, if true, would violate the Medical Practice Act.
Investigation Referred to the Health Quality Investigation Unit. Sexual misconduct is one of the categories the Board says may be referred immediately for investigation rather than waiting in the ordinary queue.
Impact statement Under Business and Professions Code § 2220.2 you have up to 60 days after notification to give the Board a statement describing how you were affected.
Attorney General If investigators substantiate a violation, the case goes to the AG’s Health Quality Enforcement Section, which decides whether to file a formal accusation.
Administrative hearing If the physician contests the accusation, an administrative law judge hears it and writes a proposed decision. A Board panel can adopt it, reduce the penalty, or increase it.

You will be told when your complaint is closed, and whether a violation was found. You are not, however, a party to the case. The Board is not your lawyer and the process is not built around your preferences about outcome.

Is there a deadline?

There is no deadline on complaining. There are limits on how far back the Board can reach when it files formal charges, set by Business and Professions Code § 2230.5.

Situation Limit on filing an accusation
Most conduct Three years after the Board discovers it, or seven years after it happened — whichever comes first
Sexual misconduct Three years after discovery, or ten years after the act — whichever comes first
Complainant was a minor at the time The seven- and ten-year clocks do not begin until the complainant turns 18
Licence obtained by fraud No time limit

Do not confuse this with the civil deadline

The Board’s limits govern licence discipline only. The deadline for a civil claim in California is set by an entirely different statute, Code of Civil Procedure § 340.16, and it currently includes a revival period that reaches back much further than ten years. If a Board complaint would be out of time, a civil claim may not be. See the statute of limitations explained and the filing deadline.

What if the doctor no longer holds a licence?

Physicians sometimes retire, let a licence lapse, or surrender it while a matter is pending. That narrows what discipline the Board can usefully add — you cannot revoke a licence that has already been given up.

It does not make the complaint pointless. The complaint becomes part of the Board’s file. It is relevant if the physician ever petitions for reinstatement, and licensing boards in other states routinely check California’s record. And it remains completely independent of any civil claim, which is unaffected by whether a licence still exists.

Places other than the Medical Board

  • Law enforcement. The Medical Board itself encourages complainants to consider filing a police report. This is your decision alone, and choosing not to is not a judgement on whether what happened was serious.
  • The hospital or medical group. Most have a patient relations or risk management office. Reporting there creates an internal record, though the institution is not a neutral party.
  • The California Department of Public Health, for complaints about a licensed facility rather than an individual physician.
  • A civil attorney, if what you want is compensation or an accounting of what an institution knew. Consultations in these cases are typically free and carry no obligation. What filing actually involves sets out what that path looks like.

Common questions

Can I report a doctor anonymously in California?

You can submit a complaint without giving your name, but the Board says anonymous complaints are harder to investigate, because staff cannot come back to you for records, dates or clarification. If you do give your name, the Board may provide the physician with a summary of the substance of the complaint as part of its investigation. Your name is not published, but it is not sealed from the licensee either.

Does filing a Medical Board complaint start a lawsuit?

No. The Board is a licensing agency, not a court. It can discipline, restrict or revoke a licence. It cannot award money, order a refund, or file a civil case for you. The two are separate tracks and you can pursue either, both, or neither.

Will I have to testify?

Possibly, if the case reaches an administrative hearing and the Attorney General’s office needs your account. Most complaints never get that far. If yours does, you would be told well in advance, and an administrative hearing is a smaller and less formal setting than a courtroom.

How long does it take?

The Board does not publish a target. Straightforward complaints closed at the review stage can take a few months. Investigated matters that reach the Attorney General commonly take well over a year. Sexual misconduct cases can be referred for investigation immediately, which shortens the front end but not the whole process.

What if I am not sure it was misconduct?

You do not have to be sure. Deciding whether conduct crossed a line is the Board’s job, not yours, and a complaint that turns out to be unfounded costs you nothing. If you are trying to work out where the line sits, was it abuse? and chaperones and what a proper exam looks like may help you think it through first.

Does complaining affect my medical care?

Retaliating against a patient for filing a complaint would itself be a licensing problem. In practice, most people who file are no longer seeing the physician concerned. If you are still a patient of the practice and that worries you, it is a fair reason to talk to a lawyer before filing rather than after.

Next steps that commit you to nothing

Sources

  1. Medical Board of California, Complaint Process — filing routes, investigation stages, impact statements under B&P § 2220.2, and priority referral of sexual misconduct matters.
  2. Medical Board of California, Sexual Misconduct — the Board’s definition of sexual misconduct and its encouragement to consider a police report.
  3. California Business and Professions Code § 2230.5 — limitation periods for accusations, including the ten-year outer limit for sexual misconduct and tolling for minors.
  4. California Business and Professions Code §§ 726 and 729 — sexual misconduct as unprofessional conduct and sexual exploitation by a physician.

Last reviewed and updated: September 3, 2026. This page describes general California procedure and is not legal advice about your situation. Confirm anything on this page with a lawyer or with the Board before relying on it.